E-ISSN 2548-0839
Volume : 10 Issue : 1 Year : 2025

Metrics

1.6
2023 IMPACT FACTOR
2.1
5 year Impact Factor
0.00061
Eigenfactor
3.4
2023 CiteScore
86/157
Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2024)(Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine (Science))
Quartile Q3
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Effect of Various Disinfection Protocols on Endodontic Biofilm and Growth Factors Release from Radicular Dentin: An In Vitro Study [Eur Endod J]
Eur Endod J. 2025; 10(1): 1-10 | DOI: 10.14744/eej.2024.84856

Effect of Various Disinfection Protocols on Endodontic Biofilm and Growth Factors Release from Radicular Dentin: An In Vitro Study

Abhilasha Gugliani1, Sonali Taneja2, Devi Charan Shetty3, Vidhi Kiran Bhalla4
1Consultant Endodontist, ITS Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, ITS Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Uttar Pradesh, India
3Department of Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, ITS Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Uttar Pradesh, India
4Project Scientist, Dental Technology Innovation Hub, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, India

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of various disinfection protocols on bacterial biofilm and subsequent release of growth factors from radicular dentin.
Methods: One hundred and ninety two extracted single rooted premolars were obtained and contaminated with E. faecalis biofilm for 21 days. The samples were then divided into three main groups – Group I: Irrigation (I) only, Group II: Calcium hydroxide (CH) placement followed by final irrigation and Group III: Triple Antibiotic paste (TAP) placement followed by final irrigation. Each group was further then divided into four sub-groups according to the final irrigating solution used – Sub group A: Saline, Sub group B: 17% EDTA, Sub group C: 1% phytic acid and Sub group D: 0.2%. chitosan nanoparticles. After treatment, the samples were subjected to colony-forming unit (CFU) analysis to determine bacterial reduction and the release of TGF-β1 and VEGF from the root canals, which was quantified using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The data were analyzed using statistical tests.
Results: The maximum reduction in E. faecalis biofilm was observed in Group III (TAP), followed by Group II (CH), and finally Group I (irrigation only). Among the subgroups, the maximum reduction in bacterial biofilm was seen with chitosan nanoparticles, followed by phytic acid, EDTA, and saline. After 24 hours, the highest release of both TGF-β1 and VEGF was observed in the chitosan nanoparticles subgroup, followed by phytic acid, EDTA, and saline. Similar results were seen in the CH and TAP groups.
Conclusion: The study concluded that newer irrigating solutions, particularly 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles, showed superior antibacterial activity and better smear layer removal, leading to greater growth factor release from the radicular dentin. The study also highlighted that TAP placement resulted in maximum bacterial reduction, regardless of the final irrigant used. Furthermore, the release of TGF-β1 was significantly higher than VEGF in all groups. (EEJ-2024-03-045)

Keywords: Dental biofilm, disinfection, growth factors, radicular dentin, regenerative endodontics

Corresponding Author: Sonali Taneja
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE
 (16 accesses)
 (256 downloaded)
LookUs & Online Makale