E-ISSN 2548-0839
Volume : 3 Issue : 2 Year : 2024


5 year Impact Factor
2022 CiteScore
Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2023)(Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine (Science))
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
European Endodontic Journal Effect of DNase treatment on adhesion and early biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis [Eur Endod J]
Eur Endod J. 2018; 3(2): 82-86 | DOI: 10.14744/eej.2018.55264

Effect of DNase treatment on adhesion and early biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis

Sebastian Schlafera1, Javier Garciaa2, Rikke L. Meyerb3, Michael Væthd4, Klaus W. Neuhause5
1Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Denmark
2Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
3Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University; Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center, Aarhus University, Denmark
4Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
5Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry, University of Bern, Switzerland

Objective: Extracellular DNA (eDNA) has been shown to be important for biofilm stability of the endodontic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis. In this study, we hypothesized that treatment with DNase prevents adhesion and disperses young E. faecalis biofilms in 96-well plates and root canals of extracted teeth.
Methods: E. faecalis eDNA in 96-well plates was visualized with TOTO-1®. The effect of DNase treatment was assessed in 96-well plates and in extracted single-rooted premolars (n=37) using a two-phase crossover design. E. faecalis was treated with DNase (50 Kunitz/mL) or heat-inactivated DNase for 1 h during adhesion or after 24 h of biofilm formation. In 96-well plates, adhering cells were quantified using confocal microscopy and digital image analysis. In root canals, the number of adhering cells was determined in dentine samples based on colony forming unit counts. Data from the 96-well plate were analyzed using one-tailed t-tests, and data from extracted teeth were analyzed using mixed-effect Poisson regressions.
Results: eDNA was present in wells colonized by E. faecalis after 1 h of adhesion and 24 h of biofilm formation; it was removed by DNase treatment, as evidenced by TOTO®-1 staining. DNase treatment reduced the area covered by cells in 96-well plates after 1 h (p<0.05), but not after 24 h (p=0.96). No significant differences in the number of adhering cells were observed in extracted teeth after 1 (p=0.14) and 24 h (p=0.98).
Conclusion: DNase treatment does not disperse endodontic E. faecalis biofilms. The sole use of DNase as an anti-biofilm agent in root canal treatments is not recommendable.

Keywords: Adhesion, biofilm, DNase, Enterococcus faecalis, endodontic biofilms, extracellular DNA, immunology, microbiology

Sebastian Schlafera, Javier Garciaa, Rikke L. Meyerb, Michael Væthd, Klaus W. Neuhause. Effect of DNase treatment on adhesion and early biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis. Eur Endod J. 2018; 3(2): 82-86

Corresponding Author: Sebastian Schlafera, Denmark
Manuscript Language: English
LookUs & Online Makale