E-ISSN 2548-0839
Volume : 10 Issue : 2 Year : 2025

Metrics

1.6
2023 IMPACT FACTOR
2.1
5 year Impact Factor
0.00061
Eigenfactor
3.4
2023 CiteScore
86/157
Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2024)(Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine (Science))
Quartile Q3
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Effectiveness of Three Rotary File Systems on Enterococcus faecalis in Single Rooted Teeth: An In Vitro Study [Eur Endod J]
Eur Endod J. Ahead of Print: EEJ-51423 | DOI: 10.14744/eej.2025.51423

Effectiveness of Three Rotary File Systems on Enterococcus faecalis in Single Rooted Teeth: An In Vitro Study

Roghith Kannan1, Bassem Eid1, Pooja Adtani2, Tarek Elsewify3, Ranya Elemam1
1Department of Restorative Dental Science, Gulf Medical University, College of Dentistry, Ajman, UAE
2Department of Basic Medical and Dental Sciences, Gulf Medical University, College of Dentistry, Ajman, UAE
3Department of Endodontics, Ain Shams University, Egypt; Department of Endodontics, Gulf Medical University, College of Dentistry, Ajman, UAE

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of three rotary file systems on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) biofilms in single-rooted teeth.
Methods: A total of 70 mandibular premolars were investigated. N=60 of the root canals were inoculated with E. faecalis. The positive control group (n=5) received bacterial inoculation without mechanical preparation. The negative control group (n=5) was neither infected nor mechanically prepared. Teeth were randomly assigned to 3 experimental groups (n = 20 per-group) according to application of the rotary files: Group 1: XP-endo Rise Shaper (FKG, Le Crêt-du-Locle, Switzerland); Group 2: XP-endo Shaper (FKG, Le Crêt-du-Locle, Switzerland); Group 3: ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Sirona, Erlangen, Germany). Samples were collected using paper points before (S1) and after (S2) mechanical preparation. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were used to quantify bacterial loads.
Results: Significant differences in bacterial counts were observed from S1 to S2 in all tested groups (p < 0.001). Intergroup comparisons revealed no significant differences between the XP-endo Rise Shaper and XP-endo Shaper groups (p > 0.05). nor XP-endo Shaper and ProTaper Gold groups (p > 0.05). Significant differences were observed between the XP-endo Rise Shaper and ProTaper Gold groups (P<0.05). The XP-endo Rise shaper group showed the largest reduction in bacterial loads (98.2%), followed by the XP-endo Shaper (96.0%) and ProTaper Gold (93.8%) groups.
Conclusion: All the rotary files in our study were able to reduce bacteria but the novel single-file
system (XP-endo Rise shaper) was superior in reducing bacterial load compared to XP-endo
Shaper and the multiple file system (ProTaper Gold). (EEJ-2024-08-133)

Keywords: Disinfection, Enterococcus faecalis, root canal instrumentation, rotary files

Corresponding Author: Ranya Elemam
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE
LookUs & Online Makale