E-ISSN 2548-0839
Volume : 9 Issue : 4 Year : 2024

Metrics

1.6
2023 IMPACT FACTOR
2.1
5 year Impact Factor
0.00061
Eigenfactor
3.4
2023 CiteScore
86/157
Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2024)(Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine (Science))
Quartile Q3
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Bending resistance and cyclic fatigue life of a new single-file reciprocating instrument WaveOne Gold [Eur Endod J]
Eur Endod J. 2016; 1(1): 4 | DOI: 10.5152/eej.2016.16018

Bending resistance and cyclic fatigue life of a new single-file reciprocating instrument WaveOne Gold

Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva1, Justine Monnerat Tinoco1, Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco2, Victor Talarico Leal Vieira2, Luciana Moura Sassone3, Hélio Pereira Lopes3
1Department of Endodontics, Grande Rio University (UNIGRANRIO) School of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2Department of Endodontics, Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ) School of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
3Department of Endodontics (H.P.L) Estácio de Sá University (UNESA) School of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the bending resistance and cyclic fatigue fracture resistance of a new single-file reciprocating instrument called WaveOne Gold. Reciproc and WaveOne instruments were used as references for comparison.
Methods: Sixty 25-mm NiTi instruments (Reciproc R25, WaveOne Primary and WaveOne Gold Primary) were tested. Flexibility was determined by applying 45° bending tests using a universal testing machine (n=10). A custom-made device was used during cyclic fatigue test (n=10), comprising a stainless steel artificial ca- nal measuring 1.4 mm in diameter, 19 mm in total length with an 86° angle and 6 mm radius of curvature. Possible deformations at the helical shaft and mode of fracture were evaluated using scanning electron mi- croscopy analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance. Post hoc pair-wise comparisons were performed using Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons (P<0.05).
Results: WaveOne presented significantly higher bending resistance than the other tested systems (P<0.05), whereas Reciproc presented the lowest bending resistance (P<0.05). Reciproc revealed a significantly longer cyclic fatigue fracture resistance than the other systems (P<0.05).
Conclusions: Although WaveOne Gold presented higher flexibility than WaveOne, no differences in the resis- tance to fatigue were observed between both systems. The Reciproc files were more flexible and resistant to fatigue for the angle of curvature of 86° and 6 mm radius than WaveOne and WaveOne Gold files.

Keywords: Bending resistance, cyclic fatigue, instrumentation and rotary, reciprocating movement, NiTi alloy; WaveOne Gold

Corresponding Author: Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, Brazil
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE
 (1610 accesses)
 (2535 downloaded)
LookUs & Online Makale