E-ISSN 2548-0839
Volume : 10 Issue : 3 Year : 2025

Metrics

1.6
2023 IMPACT FACTOR
2.1
5 year Impact Factor
0.00061
Eigenfactor
3.4
2023 CiteScore
86/157
Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2024)(Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine (Science))
Quartile Q3
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Antimicrobial Effectiveness of High-Power Sonic and Ultrasonic Devices Combined with Stepwise Intraoperative or Final Activation of Sodium Hypochlorite [Eur Endod J]
Eur Endod J. Ahead of Print: EEJ-69926 | DOI: 10.14744/eej.2025.69926

Antimicrobial Effectiveness of High-Power Sonic and Ultrasonic Devices Combined with Stepwise Intraoperative or Final Activation of Sodium Hypochlorite

Flaviana Bombarda De Andrade1, Maricel Rosario Cardenas Cuellar1, Victor Feliz Pedrinha1, Márcia Sirlene Zardin Graeff2, Gianluca Plotino3
1Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, São Paulo, Brazil
2Integrated Research Center, University of São Paulo, Bauru School of Dentistry, São Paulo, Brazil
3Private Practice, Grande Plotino and Torsello – Studio di Odontoiatria, Rome, Italy

Objective: This study investigated the intratubular decontamination promoted by high-power sonic and ultrasonic devices using either a stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) technique or a final conventional activation (CA) approach during root canal chemomechanical preparation.
Methods: Fifty human lower premolars were contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and assigned into five groups (n=8): conventional syringe irrigation (CSI); final ultrasonic activation (FUA) using the ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI S; final sonic agitation (FSA) using the high-power sonic insert 20/28 Eddy system (both CA techniques); stepwise ultrasonic activation (SUA); and stepwise sonic agitation (SSA) using the same devices during and after canal preparation (SIA techniques). Remaining specimens served as controls. Root canal preparation was performed with the Reciproc system and 5.25% NaOCl, followed by final irrigation with 17% EDTA. Bacterial viability was assessed via confocal microscopy with Live/Dead technique. Statistical analysis was employed using non-parametric tests (α=0.05).
Results: SUA showed the lowest bacterial viability, followed by FSA, both statistically similar. SSA and FUA were similar but less effective than SUA and FSA (p < 0.05). The CSI group had significantly higher bacterial viability compared to all other groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: High-power sonic agitation and ultrasonic activation enhanced intratubular decontamination against E. faecalis. The SIA technique, using IRRI S or Eddy systems, effectively reduced bacterial viability and represents a promising approach for root canal disinfection. (EEJ-2024-11-185)

Keywords: Endodontics, Enterococcus faecalis, root canal irrigants, root canal preparation, ultrasonics

Corresponding Author: Victor Feliz Pedrinha
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE
LookUs & Online Makale